Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Dr M says sees no need to explain MAS deals

    By Shannon Teoh

    KUALA LUMPUR, Feb 23 — Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad brushed off today Datuk Zaid Ibrahim’s call that he “write a book” on why Malaysia Airline System (MAS) was privatised to Tan Sri Tajudin Ramli in 1994, saying he was not in charge of the loss-making national carrier.

    “I’m not in charge of MAS, how can I write a book? I can make some comments, that’s all,” the former prime minister told reporters today.

    Zaid, who was de facto law minister in 2008, wrote in his blog today that Dr Mahathir (picture) must explain by “writing (a book) that is believable, that at least reflects the true situation surrounding the MAS saga that has still not been resolved until today.”

    Zaid, who resigned from Umno in September 2008 to join PKR but is now estranged from Pakatan Rakyat (PR), has backed the opposition’s criticism of recent confidential out-of-court settlements between Tajudin and several GLCs.

    “Since the settlement was conducted in secret, allow me to guess the terms of the deal: Tajudin was not required to pay a single sen to Danaharta or any of the GLCs; instead, the government will pay Tajudin RM6.5 billion (or half of what he had claimed).

    “Tajudin will then be generous in his contributions to the party coffers for the upcoming general election,” he said.

    Tajudin’s settlement with Pengurusan Danaharta Bhd (Danaharta) on February 14 came after a lengthy legal dispute following a High Court decision in December 2009 ordering the ex-MAS chief to pay the state asset management manager RM589.14 million plus two per cent interest per year, backdated to January 1, 2006.

    But Dr Mahathir, who was PM from 1981 to 2003, insisted today “the government is very sensitive to these things because it may affect the image of the government and the support in the next election.”

    “If they have evidence that there was blatant abuse of power they can make a case for it,” he added.

    Tajuddin, who was MAS chairman until 2001, was also a poster boy of former Finance Minister Tun Daim Zainuddin’s now discredited policy of nurturing a class of Malay corporate captains on government largesse during the Mahathir administration.

    The case between Danaharta and Tajudin arose after he executed a facility agreement on July 13, 1994 to borrow RM1.79 billion from a group of syndicated lenders to finance his purchase of a 32 per cent stake in MAS.

    However, from 1994 to 1998 he failed to service the original loan, causing it to become a non-performing loan (NPL).

    In 1998, Danaharta acquired the NPL from the lenders but Tajuddin also failed to settle his debt to Danaharta until it was in default of RM1.41 billion as at October 8, 2001.

    As part of a settlement agreement, Tajudin was to pay RM942 million in four instalments over three years and that he was permitted to redeem his charged shares at a minimum price per share.

    Tajudin, however, defaulted in the payment of the quarterly interest payable under the settlement agreement and on April 27, 2002, the plaintiffs terminated the settlement agreement and demanded RM1.61 billion from him.

    On April 29, 2002, Danaharta, together with its units Danaharta Urus Sdn Bhd and Danaharta Managers Sdn Bhd sold part of the charged shares consisting entirely of Technology Resources Industries (TRI) shares at RM2.75 per share, resulting in total proceeds of RM717.39 million.

    As at December 31, 2005, the amount outstanding was RM589.14 million and on May 11, 2006, Danaharta and the subsidiaries commenced action to recover the money.

    Tajudin had alleged in his affidavit that it was Dr Mahathir and Daim who directed him in 1994 to buy a controlling stake in MAS to bail out the government.

    Tajudin claimed that his purchase was a forced “national service”, disguised as an arm’s length commercial deal, because the government wanted to appease the investment community and the public.

    Dr Mahathir, however, denied in his autobiography published last March that he and Daim had forced Tajudin to bail out MAS in 1994 for RM1.8 billion, claiming instead that Tajudin was “elated” over his purchase.

    How do you feel about this article?

     

    13 comments

    • Alwalid  •  Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur  •  2 months ago
      Kenapa tak payah explain ? Anda sekarang takut ke ? Masa awak memerintah beberapa banyak kes RASUAH yg timbul... Kes Bankbumi RM2 billion, Perwaja Steel Bhd RM700 million dan banyak lagi kes Rasuah yg timbul pada zaman anda..
      • Hassan Sin 2 months ago
        kan tun dah jawap dah...
        “the government is very sensitive to these things
        because it may affect the image of the government and the support in the next election.”
        pengakuan jujur dari tun. kalau penyelesaian ni menguntungkan negara dan rakyat, dah lama dah dihebahkan dalam media.
        kalau boleh menjejaskan imej dan sokongan rakyat pada kerajaan maknanya benda ni BUSUK la..
    • yk  •  Bangkok, Thailand  •  2 months ago
      may I ask DR who has the right to decide the privatisation of Mas,Misc,telekom etc.After all of these wrong decisions,you said you are not in-charge of all these proects.
      • LIMT 2 months ago
        ADA JUGA YANG MENDAPAT PENCEN BAWAH RM200 LEPAS SWASTA, ITUPUN TERPAKSA KHIDMAT 5TAHUN KEAtas dan capai umur 50tahun. Ramai yang terpaksa hidup dengan wang pencen bawah PARAS KEMISKINAN. SEDANGKAN IA KANTOI BERBILLION WANG RAKYAT..........????
    • redfaceindian  •  2 months ago
      Mahathir Mamak has made the UMNO Malays look like dunggus and the ordinary Malays look like suckers. He manipulated the whole lot and gets away with it. Until today nobody has an answer why are the authorities so afraid of this rogue Mamak. The police, the courts, the MACC, anti-corruption, UMNO, BN government. Are they afraid that a " Domino effect " will take place if he was brought in front of the judge ?
    • joseph  •  Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur  •  2 months ago
      I wonder if this is a planned event or another one of those unexplainable missuse of the rakyats funds. Why not prove it???
    • John  •  Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur  •  2 months ago
      Its ok, explain after GE 13.
    • Tuck  •  2 months ago
      Take it to next level: STOP commenting on everything; we will love u more this way.
    • Simon  •  2 months ago
      It's not that there is no need to explain MAS deals. In actual fact, the government don't know how to explain MAS deals. And it looks like Dr. M has been appointed the government spokesman. Why his comments? What happen to the PM? Where is the DPM?
    • Kelly  •  Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur  •  2 months ago
      The MAS-TR-Naluri-Celcom was then a wholesale deal involving MM Govt Adm as financial institutions would not have folked out funds without colaterals in lending procedures. Who were then the top Govt Offcials with the authorities to direct investment actions? The suceeding Fin Minister would have accesses to the entire MAS transactions. TR was a stooge in such cover-up drama and the then Fund Managers also had better pictures leading to the deal. The '97 economic turmoil added more salt to this event leading to flat sstock market. Let's see more revelations from involved audiences in coming days!
    • LIMT  •  Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur  •  2 months ago
      I HOPE WHO EVER COME INTO POWER IN THE NEXT ELECTION WILL TAKE ACTION ON THESE ILLEGAL DEALS AND CHARGE THOSE INVOLVED, IF THE AMOUNT DEALS MORE THEN RM500K A SUGGEST THE PUNISHMENT TO SHOT TO DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Cat lover  •  2 months ago
      Ini di panggil SONGLAP
    • Momogun  •  2 months ago
      the Mother of ILICIT @ SONGLAP,.
    • Idrus  •  Bandar Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan  •  2 months ago
      You know,in Communist China,the penalty for corruption, if found guilty,is death by firing squad ! On the other hand,here in Malaysia,where the official religion is Islam,with the top leaders being Muslim ,and more than 90% of the police and the judiciary are muslim,and with corruption being regarded as a MAJOR SIN in Islam,not only are we incapable of tackling this problem but worse than that ,the authorities try to cover them up whenever possible !
      What a shameful and pathetic situation we are in ! To all muslims and fellow Malaysians,if we choose to be silent and inactive ,on this problem,we are just as guilty as those who commit the actual crime !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! May GOD help us all !
    • Idrus  •  Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur  •  2 months ago
      This is corruption at the highest level ,in a system that is corrupted to the highest degree ! And this can only happen, in this BOLEHLAND!!!!! .

    Most Popular

    POLL

    What concerns you about Malaysia?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options