Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Obama decries rising cost of college education

    ANN ARBOR, Mich. (AP) — President Barack Obama called Friday for an overhaul of the higher education financial aid system, warning that colleges and universities that fail to control spiraling tuition costs could lose federal funds.

    The election year proposal was also a political appeal to young people and working families, two important voting blocs for Obama. But the initiative faces long odds in Congress, which must approve nearly all aspects of the president's plan.

    Speaking to students at the University of Michigan, Obama said he was "putting colleges on notice" that the era of unabated tuition hikes is over.

    "You can't assume that you'll just jack up tuition every single year. If you can't stop tuition from going up, then the funding you get from taxpayers each year will go down," Obama said on the final stop of a three-day post-State of the Union trip to promote components of his economic agenda.

    Obama told the largely supportive student audience that the nation's economic future depended on making sure every American can afford a world-class education.

    "In the coming decade, 60 percent of new jobs will require more than a high school diploma," he said. "Higher education is not a luxury. It's an economic imperative that every family in America should be able to afford."

    The president first announced the outlines of the financial aid proposal during Tuesday's State of the Union address. His plan targets what is known as "campus based" aid given to colleges to distribute in areas such as Perkins loans or in work study programs. Of the $142 billion in federal grants and loans distributed in the last school year, about $3 billion went to these programs. His plan calls for increasing that type of aid to $10 billion annually.

    He also wants to create a "Race to the Top" competition in higher education similar to the one his administration used on K-12 to encourage states to better use higher education dollars in exchange for $1 billion in prize dollars. A second competition called "First in the World" would encourage innovation to boost productivity on campuses.

    Obama is also pushing for the creation of new tools to allow students to determine which colleges and universities have the best value.

    Some in the higher education community are nervous that the Obama administration could be setting a new precedent in the federal government's role in controlling the rising costs of college. Following the speech, Molly Corbett Broad, president of the American Council on Education, issued a statement saying there's concern that the proposal would "move decision-making in higher education from college campuses to Washington, D.C."

    Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., a former education secretary, said the autonomy of U.S. higher education is what makes it the best in the world, and he's questioned whether Obama can enforce any plan that shifts federal aid away from colleges and universities without hurting students.

    "It's hard to do without hurting students, and it's not appropriate to do," Alexander said. "The federal government has no business doing this."

    But Obama education secretary, Arne Duncan, said Friday that institutions of higher learning should get federal dollars based in part on their performance.

    "Historically, we've funded universities whether or not they've done a good job of graduating people, whether or not they've done a good job of keeping down tuition," Duncan said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

    Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., the ranking member of the House Education and Workforce Committee, said there is bipartisan concern in Congress about the rising costs of college, and he's hopeful the president's plan will open up a dialogue about the problem. Some Republicans in the past, including Rep. Buck McKeon, R-Calif., have offered proposals similar to the president's.

    The administration has already taken a series of steps to expand the availability of grants and loans and to make loans easier to pay back. During the State of the Union, Obama spelled out other proposals to make college more affordable, such as extending a tuition tax break and asking Congress to keep loan interest rates from doubling in July.

    His administration has also targeted career college programs — primarily at for-profit institutions — with high loan default rates among graduates over multiple years by taking away their ability to participate in such programs.

    But until now, the administration has done little to turn its attention to the rising cost of tuition at traditional colleges and universities.

    The average in-state tuition and fees at four-year public colleges last fall rose 8.3 percent and, with room and board, now exceed $17,000 a year, according to the College Board. Rising tuition costs have been blamed on a variety of factors, including a decline in state dollars, an over-reliance on federal student loan dollars and competition for the best facilities and professors.

    ___

    Hefling reported from Washington.

    How do you feel about this article?

     
    • JanetK  •  Simi Valley, United States  •  3 months ago
      Why does a book cost $150?
      • I WIll Tread on You 3 months ago
        Because a new book is made every year
      • off topic 3 months ago
        Because you have to have it to pass
      • marks 3 months ago
        My brother tells me that is the publishers bread and butter (textbooks)
    • John  •  Fort Worth, United States  •  3 months ago
      If you subsidize something, the cost will rise. It is that simple.
      • Charles 3 months ago
        Good point, but you mean the price...the cost...they'll never admit that.
      • asfasdf 3 months ago
        Spot on. The market will always be able to bear whatever the increase in the subsidy.
      • Caveman 3 months ago
        Thats exactly the problem. The more money the feds pump into either education or healthcare the more prices rise. What you have is everyone chasing all this free money and the only way for them to get this money is to raise costs. All this money distorts the free market and produces no competition. If there was truly competition in education or healthcare, prices would fall. The feds should get completely out of healthcare and education. No where in the Constitution does it say they have to support either one of them.
    • George Mason  •  Irvine, United States  •  3 months ago
      "Obama decries rising cost of college education"
      American population decries rising cost of food and energy.
      If fact, economically, the only thing that is going down
      is the purchasing power and value of the American dollar.
      • Jim 3 months ago
        Your post just gave Obama the idea to tax food and energy and then use 60% of the receipts to fund college education, 60% to pay for the agency that will administer the payments, 60% to improve public K-12 education, and the reamaining 60% to pay down the debt.
      • Jahudi 3 months ago
        Right Jim. Do you work for the gov'mnt??? 3 60%s 180%
      • Meatwad 3 months ago
        Thanks Jahudi, that was his point.
    • Suzanne M  •  Irvine, United States  •  3 months ago
      Got a couple of questions for people to think about:
      (1) Why are there more administrators than teachers in the Calif Stat Univ system? I wonder about other university systems
      (2) Why are you gettting a "degree" in a field that doesn't have jobs, and paying for it with student loans you "know" you can't repay?
      • ken 3 months ago
        Cuz your stupid?
      • Rich 3 months ago
        Another question: why don't students demand colleges to show reliable job demand before they commit to a major area of study?
      • lor 3 months ago
        a person going to college should check that out themselves.. for a job demand. a college is to teach, not do the research for you.if you can't do that for yourself then the person does not belong in college.
    • zxcvzxcv  •  3 months ago
      tuition and health care increases of the past couple decades are unjustifiable
      • T. 3 months ago
        At least with health care increases you get robotic surgery and new drugs.

        With all the tuition hikes, all you get are dreary faculty presentations of "The Vagina Monologues".
      • Eric 3 months ago
        Ron paul would agree,. He has been saying this for years
      • MNBruce 3 months ago
        Agree with all of you. What Obumbler care has already started to do, according to the CBO, is increase the annual family costs of healthcare from $12K and some change to over $15K! And, we can look for limitation of services and further increased costs when it goes into full effect. With all of the participation waivers the Regime has issued so far, even they know that it sucks!
    • robertw  •  3 months ago
      The only thing that has higher yearly cost increases than education is health care.
    • BnMeAintEz  •  Stockton, United States  •  3 months ago
      what they need to cut is how much the deans at the colleges...300k + a year....not necessary....but they want to cut classes, teachers, and raise prices for students...something is wrong with that situation.....
    • Bourbon  •  3 months ago
      Plumbers will make more than most of the graduates of second rate colleges.
    • 3 years of nothing  •  3 months ago
      it's like the fannie/freddie thing- everyone gets a loan so colleges can charge what they want. the only thing different is that the borrowers can't default if they ever want to see a tax refund! they will get their money and they don't care what the college charges, not their problem.
    • Deny  •  Rockford, United States  •  3 months ago
      Yep, that's the problem. They keep wanting raises, and we keep losing jobs, and wages. You can't get something, if no one has it to give. We don't have a printing press...
    • Morpheous  •  Fort Worth, United States  •  3 months ago
      Student loans, grants, government support, research funding all plentiful and easy to get plus government and social pressure for everyone to go to college. There's no incentive for colleges to be cost efficient.
    • Lyle  •  Yakima, United States  •  3 months ago
      Stop educating non citizens free.
    • ED  •  3 months ago
      You can lower the costs of an education by not requiring all those worthless block classes. How may of us had to take those pass/fail music appreciation classes or art history.just for the credit hours. Don't even start on the football coaches million dollar salaries.
    • alexnlulu  •  Ephrata, United States  •  3 months ago
      WHAT JOBS???????
    • John  •  Woburn, United States  •  3 months ago
      Perhaps Obama would like to discuss the common practice at public universities of hiring politically connected hacks to six-figure, do-nothing jobs, and the effect this has on tuition rates.

      I'm thinking in particular of the University of Chicago Medical Center hiring Michelle Obama as "Diversity Coordinator", at $360,000 / year, on the very day Barack was sworn in as senator, no less. This job was so vital to the Medical School's mission that they never bothered to replace Michelle Obama when she quit.
    • Jim  •  3 months ago
      Must be an election year.
    • John  •  Liberty, United States  •  3 months ago
      Why don't he make them teach MATH, SCIENCE, & ENGLISH, & drop all the other political correct #$%$ courses.....
    • Jahudi  •  3 months ago
      I decry the rising cost of gas.
    • JohnG  •  3 months ago
      Lets start by eliminating tenure and full professors who 'teach' one class a week. The amount of waste at public universities is criminal.
    • Have a thought!  •  Miami, United States  •  3 months ago
      To bad they don't consider "quality" of education important. As a professor I can lower the standards and pass every student. The school can double up the class size, get rid of labs and use out of date teaching material to drop cost. The schools could even drop salary of professors. However, considering what what we (professors) could make in industry with our advance degrees how could schools hope to get anyone qualified to teach paying them what a Mcdonald's supervisor with only a high school degree makes?

      You would think after the mess they (politicians) made with "No Child Left Behind" they would know better than to try simple, quick fixes with education. All that does is makes it worse. To bad politicians can't see the fundamental flaw of the stupid stuff they are doing. Must be the poor college education they got when they went to school.

    Most Popular

    • Anwar claims symbolic win after former prosecutor joins legal team
      Anwar claims symbolic win after former prosecutor joins legal team

      KUALA LUMPUR, May 22 — Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim claimed a symbolic victory today in having the man who unsuccessfully prosecuted him for sodomy join his legal team to defend an illegal assembly charge, pointing out that someone who was in government did not want to be a part of what he called the “dirtiness”.

    • Manji: Allah made gays and lesbians, too
      Manji: Allah made gays and lesbians, too

      INTERVIEW Unapologetic for her defence of the gay and lesbian lifestyle, controversial liberal-Islam author Irshad Manji has challenged critics to explain how Allah in all His glory could have made “misfits or abominations”.                

    • To cut costs, MAS offers staff 2 years’ unpaid leave

      By Jahabar SadiqEditor KUALA LUMPUR, May 22 — Malaysia Airlines (MAS) has offered a maximum of two years of unpaid leave to its Malaysia-based employees as the flag carrier works out strategies to cut costs and seek RM6 billion to fund a re-fleeting programme after losing RM2.52 billion last year and aborting a share swap with competitor AirAsia.

    POLL
    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options